bcsproposal.com

SUPPORTING A REAL PLAYOFF SYSTEM IN COLLEGE FOOTBALL

 

The BCS Proposal   Join us on Facebook!

 

JOIN THE OUTCRY! 

 

 

Why shouldn't EVERY I-A school have a chance at a national title?  A system where nearly half the teams are not given any chance for a national title from the start is inherently fraudulent!

 

 

WE NEED A FAIR PLAYOFF FOR DIVISION I-A!

 

CLICK HERE FOR THE PROPOSAL 

(Updated December 6, 2009 to include alternate proposal)

 

If you agree...e-mail me and let the media and your elected officials in Washington know!

 

UPDATE, FIRST IN A WHILE:  TCU robbed of chance to play for the national title.  Just as insulting, TCU will not get to play Florida, which would have been a terrific matchup.

FOOD FOR THOUGHT:  Non-BCS schools cannot raise the money BCS schools can from BCS bowl revenue.  Think of that the next time you hear of an athletic program cut.  Men's programs already have pressures from colleges trying to comply with Title IX.  This could potentially hurt men's and women's sports in non-BCS schools.

"Separate but equal?"

ALERT!

 

Contact Congressman Joe Barton (R-TX) who is pushing legislation requiring a playoff.

Please let them know about bcsproposal.com so the NCAA won't replace one bad system with another! Thanks!

Congressman Joe Barton

2109 Rayburn Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-2002
(202) 225-3052 fax

 

An Open Letter to Mr. Obama:  How To Fix The BCS

 

Dennis Justice

 

 

Dear President Obama:

 

 

Sir, I seek a public audience through this correspondence to offer opinion on a subject you discussed briefly before the last election.  In an interview, you and your rival, Senator John McCain, were asked what you would fix in the sports world if you could.  Senator McCain admirably commented on the illicit steroid problem.

 

However, you discussed that it is time we had a playoff in college football.  This may be the only time you and I agree on any issue.  It seems every year, new “unforeseen” controversies occur with the Bowl Championship Series.  It’s almost as if they want the controversy for ratings’ sake.  Yet whenever the fans scream for a playoff, the “powers that be” scoff.  Perhaps you perceived their self-righteousness it in their response to your suggestion. 

 

People look at the problem at the end and not the beginning.  The fundamental problem with the Bowl Championship Series is that is disqualifies just under half of Division I-A teams right away.  Please recall, Mr. President, the years it took for your home state of Hawai’i to get to the position of a BCS bowl game, and not their national championship, despite being the only team in 2007 with an undefeated record.  Imagine a recruit being told, “no matter what, this school cannot compete for a national title.”   Where is the justice?

 

Should not a system be compelled to where every team at the start has an honest chance for the national championship, no matter how it hassles current “traditions?”  The very idea of taxpayer money being sent to colleges that allow this fraud is insulting.

 

The President and Congress should be involved because the nature of college football itself is inherently fraudulent, and therefore must violate principles and laws of interstate commerce.  Either the Tulanes and Boise States of the world have a chance at a national championship from the start, or they have no business in Division I-A football.  It is reprehensible to allow the NCAA to continue this fraud.

 

The “powers that be” keep fronting excuses as to why a playoff cannot be implemented, which cannot be reconciled with planning and common sense.  The simple man that I am laid out such a playoff on a website I invite you to visit:  www.bcsproposal.com

 

That website presents a proposal where all 119 college football programs are rearranged to eight super-conferences, or alliances, for football only.  Such an arrangement is not that far-fetched, for college hockey has six conferences that are hockey-specific.  Even the current BCS conferences are not split up in my proposal; indeed, schools would be added to them.

 

The concept is simple:  Eight alliances with two divisions each, so each alliance championship itself is a playoff game.  (Actually, a de facto sixteen team playoff.)  No polls, no computers, no traditions getting in the way.  Teams earn their chance for a national championship on the field.  Seven bowl games will take the alliance champions by region, as my hypothetical schedule demonstrates in my proposal.  I even included an alternate proposal as a fall-back.

 

Traditions are fine only when traditions make sense.   In the end, even the staunchest traditions must give way to justice.  It is apparent the “powers that be” are not interested in such justice.

 

We have seen how Senator McCain’s work has greatly reformed the commercial enterprise of mixed martial arts.  Does not this enterprise (that taxpayers partially subsidize) deserve more serious attention? 

 

I implore on you, Mr. President, to offer support for the concept of my proposal, while suggesting Congress (including my own Congressman Heath Shuler) to join you on your job to maintain truthful interstate commerce. 

 

(Update) ONE MORE SUGGESTION:  There IS something you can do that won't cost taxpayers a dime!  Don't allow an NCAA champion in the White House until the NCAA adopts a plan where EVERY Division IA program has a chance for a national championship.  My plan achieves it.

 

Thank you for your consideration.

 

 

 

Dennis Justice

Fletcher, North Carolina

 

Justice is a Sports Management major at American Military University.  He is a guest writer for oursportscentral.com, a top minor league sports webring.

 

 

 

 

NEWS:  Congress may take up BCS issue.

 

 

 


News and Notes of the BCS Proposal:

  • December 7, 2009: Congressman Joe Barton (R-TX) pushing legislation requiring a national playoff for Division I-A football!

  • December 6, 2009:  TRAVESTY!  Not only does TCU not get a title game, they are paired with Boise State.  This keeps both of them from playing a BCS conference champion.  Do we really want to see two teams that played each other last year, or watch at least TCU vs.. Florida?

  • December 5, 2009:  Interesting.  Fox Sports and espn both had a poll asking which of the four undefeated teams should play Alabama?  Texas only got around 40% in EACH poll!!  Which means the MAJORITY of people polled don't think the BCS did it's supposed job of guaranteeing the top two teams play.

  • January 2, 2008:  The defeat of Hawai'i in the Sugar Bowl only illustrates the fallacy of the BCS.  Look at all the work a non-BCS team has to go through just to get to the BCS, notice the only undefeated team doesn't even get a chance for the national title.  With a real playoff, Hawai'i could have bowed out gracefully in the first round, or be the biggest Cinderella ever.

  • January 3, 2007:  It was brought to my attention that I inexplicably left out Miami (FL).  The proposal now has the correction.  If there's any correction to be made, feel free to contact me.  The concept is what is being promoted.

  • January 2, 2007:  Did you know?  There are only six conferences in men's hockey, with 61 teams:  Atlantic (10), Central Collegiate Hockey Association (12), College Hockey America (5), ECAC Hockey League (12), Hockey East (10), and Western Collegiate Hockey Association (12).  Like college football, not every Division I-A school has men's hockey, in fact, there are even fewer colleges playing hockey.  As you can see, the number of teams in each conference or alliance is nowhere close to balanced due to geography.  This is pointed out because any "tradition" argument from opponents of the BCS Proposal stating that the "big 6" football conferences and the remainder of Division I-A schools could not be realigned to a reasonably balanced set of alliances simply does not hold water.

 

 

More information:  Dennis Justice, 31 Tamis Lane, Fletcher, NC  28732  Phone:  (828) 681-0391  E-Mail:  wncsport@aol.com